|
|
Post by Maraxus of Keld on Apr 24, 2004 0:01:09 GMT -6
[card]skullclamp[/card] SkullclampI decided this card is about an 8. I can see why it's so popular in tournaments and such, particularly type 2, but it's not really one of the greatest cards ever. Since I'm such an old-school gamer and resistant to change, I don't like Equipment as a whole, so I don't use Skullclamp and probably never will, but I won't say it's a bad card. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron Sengir on Apr 24, 2004 19:12:31 GMT -6
A very useful card. I could find a lot of uses for it.
|
|
thefallenone
Elf
"Why do you weep for the dead? I rejoice, for they have died in me." -Fallen Angel, to Serra
Posts: 85
|
Post by thefallenone on Jan 1, 2005 12:21:08 GMT -6
It's a useful card, but it was a killer of Magic, seeing as how most decks in tournaments were built around it in some way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Volrath, the Fallen on Jan 1, 2005 14:41:00 GMT -6
they weren't really built around it, it was just easy to abuse. Raffinity had such an easy time using it because whatever creature they decided to sac to the Ravager, they would clamp also. This would give the ravager a counter (possibly more if it was a modular creature) and get them 2 cards. |
|
|
|
Post by Butcher Orgg(s) on Jan 1, 2005 16:48:58 GMT -6
Degenerate, and definitely powerful.
However, if you ask me, a well designed card, R&D-wise, if a little irritating in that it failed to be caught.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maraxus of Keld on Jan 1, 2005 23:24:43 GMT -6
They should have made it only draw one card. Then it would be playable without being too powerful, and not every single deck would have run it in Standard.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron Sengir on Jan 21, 2005 18:34:14 GMT -6
Quite true.
|
|
