|
|
Post by chainer on Nov 25, 2004 19:36:31 GMT -6
...flanking...
ok for a set mechanic how about, matter (when a spell is played with matter, seach your deck for a land card and put it into play tapped)
and for the civilized side..mind (when a spell is played with mind, search your deck for an artifact that costs 3 or less and put it into play tapped)
i'm open to sugestions on how to make these better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Butcher Orgg(s) on Nov 28, 2004 20:53:02 GMT -6
Mind-Oh gods, not that. It reminds me of Mirrodin... Which causes me pain.
Matter-Uh.. Kind of random, not enough interest to last a block, I think.
Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maraxus of Keld on Dec 2, 2004 22:16:25 GMT -6
I like the names Mind and Matter, it plays up the idea of opposing mechanics for the two sides, which I think would be totally awesome. The specific mechanics though, should be ironed out a bit. Matter should probably be restricted to basic lands because if it can pull any land... well, all I have to say is Gaea's Cradle and Tolarian Academy. Also, we need to find ways to spin it, put twists on it, so that it can have enough versatility to make more than just a couple cards. Mind... not sure about that one. After all the artifact insanity that was Mirrodin, I think Butcher Orgg(s) is right, we should shy away from artifacts. I thought about suggesting enchantments instead, but unless we really played up enchantments in this block, they really aren't versatile enough. Hey, that's a thought...... we could make local enchantments a sub-theme of the block, especially for the "law" colors. Opinions? |
|
|
|
Post by Volrath, the Fallen on Dec 3, 2004 14:18:26 GMT -6
actually, thats not a bad idea. wasn;t that what we thought kamigawa was gonna be before they announced the legend thing?
I like the idea. 1 vote for enchantment sub theme here
|
|
|
|
Post by Butcher Orgg(s) on Dec 3, 2004 17:49:28 GMT -6
Sure, why not?
At this rate, we'll have a full set in, oh, just five or so years.
|
|
|
|
Post by chainer on Dec 3, 2004 20:17:26 GMT -6
hey it works for me, i always liked enchantments anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Butcher Orgg(s) on Dec 3, 2004 20:56:34 GMT -6
Me too. Someday, someone should make a decent enchantment block. By which I mean, one which is not brokenated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maraxus of Keld on Dec 11, 2004 11:29:03 GMT -6
Seems popular enough to make the enchantment thing a go.
So let's change Mind to work with enchantments instead of artifacts. But that brings up the question, should it be any kind of enchantment, or local ones (a.k.a. Enchant Creature, Enchant Land, etc.)?
|
|
|
|
Post by Butcher Orgg(s) on Dec 12, 2004 20:32:48 GMT -6
All, or global only.
|
|
|
|
Post by Volrath, the Fallen on Dec 12, 2004 22:12:43 GMT -6
i think all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Butcher Orgg(s) on Dec 13, 2004 20:12:06 GMT -6
Soitanly not local, thow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maraxus of Keld on Dec 14, 2004 0:03:39 GMT -6
Maybe some of each? I think it would be cool to have some creatures that say "When this creature comes into play, search your library for a creature enchantment and put it into play enchanting this creature" or something to that effect. Perhaps one set can have local enchantment puller-things (that's a technical term  ), the next set can have global, and the last set have both? |
|
|
|
Post by Volrath, the Fallen on Dec 14, 2004 6:12:25 GMT -6
that would be cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Butcher Orgg(s) on Dec 14, 2004 9:00:04 GMT -6
Ah, fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by chainer on Dec 14, 2004 16:52:53 GMT -6
a very cool idea, i like it!!!
|
|
), the next set can have global, and the last set have both?